<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Paper Jammed &#187; Buying guide</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paperjammed.com/tag/buying-guide/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paperjammed.com</link>
	<description>Has paper taken over your life?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 00:42:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t punish your family with stacks of photos!</title>
		<link>http://paperjammed.com/2010/02/24/dont-punish-your-family-with-stacks-of-photos/</link>
		<comments>http://paperjammed.com/2010/02/24/dont-punish-your-family-with-stacks-of-photos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 04:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Paperless Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buying guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Printing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paperjammed.com/?p=890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A while back I had a rare opportunity indeed: I went on a business trip to India to visit our offshore team. We knew it was a once in a lifetime trip, so four of us took some vacation days and paid our own way on a side trip to some of the great cities [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-897" title="iStock_000000110397XSmall" src="http://paperjammed.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/iStock_000000110397XSmall-225x300.jpg" alt="iStockphoto" width="225" height="300" />A while back I had a rare opportunity indeed: I went on a business trip to India to visit our offshore team. We knew it was a once in a lifetime trip, so four of us took some vacation days and paid our own way on a side trip to some of the great cities of India after the business was done. When we finally sat down to pool our collection on layover in Frankfurt, there were over 1,500 photos.</p>
<p>What do you do with 1,500 photographs?</p>
<p>In hope of sparing some folks hours of boredom I&#8217;d like to share my ideas on this topic here.<span id="more-890"></span></p>
<p><strong>The Endless Stack of Photos</strong></p>
<p>We have all been there. A friend or family member brandishes a stack of photos, saying &#8220;Let me show you photos of our trip to Ecuador&#8230;&#8221; (oh no&#8230; here it comes&#8230;). At this point, you reach for the photographs, but they hold the stack out of reach. They then turn each one over slowly, telling a long tale about every single image. &#8220;Oh, look at this monkey, it was so cute when he stole the candy out of little Billy&#8217;s hand and spit it into Aunt Sally&#8217;s hair.&#8221; and so on and so on.</p>
<p>You begin to look at the size of the stack and estimate how long this process will take.</p>
<p>Everyone has been on the receiving end of this treatment, but have you ever been the perpetrator?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s an easy trap to fall in to. To be honest, when you are showing photos to a friend, each image brings back a wave of pleasant memories and it is tempting to bask in the enjoyment of the memory, talking about how you felt at the time, as your friend&#8217;s eyes begin to aquire a glossy sheen.</p>
<p><strong>Don&#8217;t Be <em>That Person</em></strong></p>
<p>Remember how it felt the last time you endured a four hour photo flipping marathon and have pity on those around you.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s my strategy for pleasant photo sharing:</p>
<ul>
<li>Pare down the photo collection. Substantially.</li>
<li>Create an attractive photo album with the finest photos of the lot.</li>
<li>Hand the album to your friend and <em>let them turn the pages</em>.</li>
</ul>
<p>Back to those 1,500 photos from India&#8230;</p>
<p>Here is one of the pages from the album I made from that trip.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-903" src="http://paperjammed.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/20100224-album1.jpg" alt="" width="535" height="413" /></p>
<p>As you can see, the end result is fairly simplistic, with a few very nice photos.</p>
<p><strong>Paring Down the Stack</strong></p>
<p>Even the most avid photographer understands that <em>nobody</em> wants to see a thousand photos. And don&#8217;t think that just because you made a slideshow with music instead of printing the photos that you are exempt. You can afford to cut the number down quite a bit.</p>
<p>Consider that a typical Hollywood motion picture contains less than 10 percent of the total footage filmed. Stanley Kubrick, ever the perfectionist, took this to the extreme with shooting ratios around 100 to 1. Following the analogy, in photography, it is quite reasonable to take dozens of photos for every single picture that you might share to others.</p>
<p>The real trick is deciding exactly how far to go with the selection process.</p>
<p>In my experience, you can weed out the bad photos for hours, and when you think the job is done, you can still go back and toss out a few dozen more.</p>
<p>I filter my photos in three major phases, using the five-star rating tool of my photo library software to help keep things in order. I personally use iPhoto, but any other good photo library suite should offer ratings and smart folders.</p>
<p><strong>Phase 1: Removing obviously bad photos</strong></p>
<p>This is a very quick pass through the whole collection. I start by selecting everything and marking all photos with a neutral rating of three stars.</p>
<p>I then find any photos that are underexposed or are blurry and give them one single star. Along the way, any photos that obviously have no useful content get the same treatment.</p>
<p><strong>Phase 2: Identifying decent photos</strong></p>
<p>I use a smart folder to show all photos with three stars or greater. This hides all of the junk from the first pass.</p>
<p>Now, I go through each photo and give it a deeper look. I sort them into three different stacks, giving two stars to anything that has useless or boring content and giving four stars to photos that I think are worth showing to people. Photos that don&#8217;t fit either description retain the neutral three-star rating. These are often repeats of the one good photo I tossed in the four-star stack.</p>
<p><strong>Phase 3: Identifying the best of the best</strong></p>
<p>I use a new smart folder to show only photos with four stars or better.</p>
<p>This is the hardest part. I go through the photos and try to find the absolutely best photo that expresses each experience or thought.</p>
<ul>
<li>If the photos are of places, then it makes sense to check that you have at least one photo of each important place you visited.</li>
<li>If these are shapshots of friends and family, then you probably should verify that each person shows up in at least one of the pictures.</li>
</ul>
<p>I often have a difficult time working through photo collections from visits to my wife&#8217;s family in Brazil: there are hundreds of people in the pictures and I often have doubts over who is family and who isn&#8217;t. Fortunately, my wife sits patiently with me and helps at this stage.</p>
<p>Look again at the photos of the elephant ride and the snake charmer. I probably have two dozen different shots of the snake charmers, while the elephant shot was a single dodgy photo taken by the tour guide. I was able to pick the very best snake charmer photo, but I had little choice with the other—there was no way I was going to omit a picture of me on an elephant so I used it. These are the kinds of tradeoffs we are dealing with.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-896" src="http://paperjammed.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/20100224-rating-photos.jpg" alt="" width="535" height="350" /></p>
<p>You can see in this screenshot how I flagged most of the photos as three stars (I have already hidden all of the one-star dreck). There is one photo that has four stars, while the one next to it had an unappealing composition in my opinion, so it got two.</p>
<p><strong>How far should you go?</strong></p>
<p>I suppose this comes down to personal preference, but I like to keep things down to thirty or forty photos—from a starting point in the thousands. In a photo album, you can represent your whole trip in fifteen or twenty pages. This is far less intimidating than a big thick stack of photographs.</p>
<p>Of course, context is important. I will go out on a limb here and say that a new baby can be shown to co-workers in five photos.</p>
<p>In the end, I create a smart folder that shows only photos with five stars. And boy do they look good!</p>
<p><strong>Tweak the best photos</strong></p>
<p>My favorite tool of all for tweaking photos is the crop tool. A good crop can dramatically change the composition of a shot while still retaining the purity of the photo.</p>
<p>I will also straighten any slanting horizons and possibly fix funky light balance at this point. The tool set provided in iPhoto is quite adequate for these simple tasks.</p>
<p>Now create a slick photo album using any of the great tools available online.</p>
<p><strong>Make the Photo Album</strong></p>
<p>Again, I like using iPhoto. It allows you to easily create fancy albums using templates and so forth. Once you are done, you can buy a finished album with a few clicks.</p>
<p>Once you have your short list of photos, use a five-star smart folder as the source for the photo album. You can then spend a pleasant evening or two playing around with the layouts and composition and adding captions to your photos.</p>
<ul>
<li>Create a smart folder that shows only five-star photos</li>
<li>Create a new photo album based on that smart folder</li>
<li>Choose a pleasing layout</li>
<li>Add your photos in varying page styles to the book</li>
<li>Write some informative and/or witty captions for the photos</li>
</ul>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-906" src="http://paperjammed.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/20100224-iphoto-edit2.jpg" alt="" width="535" height="306" /></p>
<p>This is a screenshot of the iPhoto application, with the A-list photos along the top and the snake charmer page in the editing window.</p>
<p>You can even make albums like this online, without any editing software whatsoever&#8230;</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-907" src="http://paperjammed.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/20100224-winkflash.jpg" alt="" width="535" height="540" /></p>
<p>This is a similar photo album creation tool that is run completely from the <a href="http://www.winkflash.com/">Winkflash</a> website.</p>
<p>Now, finish picking out the features you want on your album (e.g. cover style) and place your order.<br />
In my opinion, these albums come with the optimal number of pages (usually 20). Any more pages could make it tedious and boring. Fit your vacation into those 20 pages.</p>
<p>These books usually cost around forty bucks, but they are worth every penny.</p>
<p><strong>The Finished Product</strong></p>
<p>When everything is done, you will have a beautiful printed photo album that looks like you bought it at a book store.</p>
<p>I have seen photo albums from three different outfits up close.</p>
<p><em>MyPublisher</em></p>
<p>I have a couple of albums from these guys and they are near perfect. The pages look like thick magazine pages, with magazine-quality photos. I found that my white-on-black text bled a little.<br />
Note that the leather used on the leather-bound books is paper thin.</p>
<p>These folks are always sending me coupons for 40% off, so it seems that you really don&#8217;t ever have to pay full price for their wares.</p>
<p><em>Apple iPhoto</em></p>
<p>These are identical to the MyPublisher books. Indeed, at one time iPhoto could send its output to either MyPublisher or Apple. I heard a rumor that MyPublisher did the books for Apple at one point.</p>
<p>The only down side to the Apple books is that you pay high shipping costs. Otherwise, the books are perfect.</p>
<p><em>Winkflash</em></p>
<p>A friend shared one of these with me. I happened to have my India album nearby, so we compared them. On the one hand, Winkflash is much cheaper; however, the image quality is not nearly as nice as the other books. Perhaps I was looking at a lower-end book from them, but the ink dots were a little coarse for my taste.</p>
<p><strong>Summary</strong></p>
<p>By putting a little effort in aggressive photo selection, basic image tweaks, and then taking advantage of the many photo book tools out there you can create a beautiful album that is a pleasure to leaf through.</p>
<p>These books have been available for several years; even so, whenever I hand one to a friend, they page through it, transfixed. People really love these albums and they actually enjoy looking through them.</p>
<p>Oh, and they make great gift ideas too!</p>
<p>What does this topic have to do with reducing paper in our lives? Believe me, printing one of these books is so much neater and cleaner than printing hundreds of loose photos. And you will enjoy them more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paperjammed.com/2010/02/24/dont-punish-your-family-with-stacks-of-photos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Life&#8217;s too short to fight with a lame shredder</title>
		<link>http://paperjammed.com/2009/06/16/lifes-too-short-to-fight-with-a-lame-shredder/</link>
		<comments>http://paperjammed.com/2009/06/16/lifes-too-short-to-fight-with-a-lame-shredder/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 02:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tools of the Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Backups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buying guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scanning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shredding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workflow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paperjammed.com/?p=577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone who is packing serious scanning hardware should also be packing serious shredding hardware. It may not matter if another Capital One offer slips into the trash intact, but there's no way I'm going to dispose of old tax records or medical records without rendering them completely useless to the enemy.

Here is my own short list of things to look for when you are buying a new shredder.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-583" src="http://paperjammed.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/istock_000008072456xsmall-300x197.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="197" /></p>
<p>I guess there must have been a time when we all lived simpler lives and didn&#8217;t care a whit about who was grubbing through our trash. Honestly, as I am shredding the week&#8217;s load of pre approved credit card offers and the like, I imagine I could just be bold and tear them all in half and toss them, <em>unshredded </em>(gasp!).</p>
<p>But anyone who is packing serious scanning hardware should also be packing serious shredding hardware. It may not matter if another Capital One offer slips into the trash intact, but there&#8217;s no way I&#8217;m going to dispose of old tax records or medical records without rendering them completely useless to the enemy.</p>
<p>Here is my own short list of things to look for when you are buying a new shredder.<span id="more-577"></span></p>
<p><strong>A Serious Tool for a Serious Job</strong></p>
<p>There are lots of sites out there that have buying recommendations for shredders, and once you wade through all of the commercial spam sites and get to some good articles, they offer pretty even coverage of the different features to look for. This is where my own opinion differs from theirs.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t waste your time with some namby-pamby little shredder that sits on your desk and shreds three thin sheets of rice paper at a time. If you are serious about reclaiming your home from paper, you need something that can wolf down loads of documents, paperclips and all.</p>
<p>This is my most firm recommendation: go for the most solid machine you can afford. Otherwise you will be buying a new one next year.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know about you, but I have been through three of the darned things. I tried the relatively cheap one and killed it within six months by overheating it. I then bought a heavy duty model that served five very good years before expiring with some mysterious illness. My current one is a somewhat smaller model, selected specifically for its reduced size by my wife.</p>
<p><strong>Good Capacity</strong></p>
<p>Make sure that your shredder is rated at a minimum of 12 sheets at a time. This way, you can insert just about any stapled document and be confident that it is not going to choke the machine.</p>
<p>See if the device can eat both credit cards and CDs. Both of these features are pleasing to have.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t bother with those silly things that have narrow slots that require you to fold the paper like a letter before insertion. Do you really want to have to fold five hundred sheets of paper like that?</p>
<p><strong>Solid Construction</strong></p>
<p>This is a fairly subjective assessment. Look at several of the machines and see which one is built better. Chances are that the <em>el cheapo</em> version will have plastic gearing and other brittle parts. If you can look inside (often from the underside) look at the gears to make sure they are metal.</p>
<p><strong>Emptying the Basket</strong></p>
<p>Imagine yourself emptying the basket. You will be doing this dozens of times.</p>
<p>Many machines have a built-in trash can that flips out from the front, leaving the rest of the machine standing. I like this feature and look for it. You should try removing and replacing the basket a few times to see if it is a fiddly task and if there are little cheap plastic tabs that are going to snap off after two weeks.</p>
<p>One kind of shredder sits on top of its basket—you must lift it off the basket entirely in order to empty the waste. Pick it up a few times. Do you mind lifting the weight? I know that my wife didn&#8217;t want to have to lift the shredder every time she emptied it, so we skipped past this style.</p>
<p>Another point to consider is whether those special shredder bags will fit in the basket of your machine. As far as I know, all shredders have some sort of mechanical interlock between the machine and the basket that shuts off the device if it is not on the basket. This is usually achieved by some little tab on the basket that slides in some slot, closing a switch. If you use a shredder bag, make sure you can do so without interfering with this safety mechanism.</p>
<p><strong>Basket Size</strong></p>
<p>A small amount of paper becomes a large volume of confetti. If you don&#8217;t mind having a larger unit taking up space in the corner, then go for the one with the bigger basket. Trust me, you are going to be lazy and let it get filled up anyway—why not at least have a longer delay before you are forced to empty it?</p>
<p>Consider a tall basket rather than a short basket. Once the top of the confetti reaches the underside of the shredder mechanism, it is possible for the blades to draw in the already shredded paper and come to a grinding standstill that may not be easy to recover from.</p>
<p><strong>Strip vs. Crosscut</strong></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know just how much to worry about this one. Everyone says to get a crosscut shredder, so that it tears your paper into little tiny diamonds, but they still are manufacturing strip shredders. The fact of the matter is, strip shredders can handle a heavier load since they aren&#8217;t chopping the paper to little tiny bits.</p>
<p>Once the paper is shredded into skinny strips, I&#8217;m pretty happy with it. Unless you are some high profile person with valuable secrets, why get worked up about it? Do you really think that someone is going to piece together all of those little strips and read about your colonoscopy three years ago?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying that it doesn&#8217;t matter at all; if you want the added security of crosscut, then go for it. I&#8217;m saying that this can be a lower priority than some of the other criteria. Don&#8217;t automatically rule out a solid performer because it is a strip shredder.</p>
<p><strong>Other Features</strong></p>
<p>They all come with various other nifty features such as automatically detecting inserted sheets and automatic reversal when there is a jam. One nice feature is an automatic cutoff when the unit has worked too hard. I think all of them do this, but some do it ungracefully by dying forever, while others tout a graceful cutoff.</p>
<p><strong>Think Before You Shred</strong></p>
<p>You don&#8217;t get a second chance. Make sure whatever you shred has been electronically captured and <a href="http://paperjammed.com/2009/01/29/backup-your-life/">backed up</a>. Is there an electronic copy <a href="http://paperjammed.com/2009/02/19/if-there-arent-two-copies-in-separate-places-it-isnt-a-backup/">safely in two places</a>?</p>
<p>If you do not have an electronic copy, then make absolutely certain that you intend to destroy the document forever—this is exactly what you are doing.</p>
<p><strong>Summary</strong></p>
<p>I believe in buying the best tools I can afford for the job, and this holds especially true for shredders. It is a serious machine that has migrated from government/military circles, to offices, and finally to the home. Pick a solid performer that can chew through whatever you throw at it.</p>
<p>A final thought: Don&#8217;t buy one sight unseen. These devices must be handled in person to be truly appreciated!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paperjammed.com/2009/06/16/lifes-too-short-to-fight-with-a-lame-shredder/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

