If you live in a slightly older home, such as mine, you occasionally might want to know which circuit breaker or fuse controls a particular outlet. Besides making it more convenient to disable the power for repairs, some of us have to deal with easily overloaded circuits that weren’t meant for all of the modern gadgetry we depend on.

Every homeowner can benefit from having a good map to their home outlets and circuit breakers, and a PDF scan of this map can make it extremely convenient to find two years later when you forgot you ever made it.

My Map

Last week my wife was asking if she could run her Jiffy Steamer in the bathroom, or if it would trip the breaker. I remembered making my cheat sheet, so I simply brought up Spotlight on my Mac and typed in “home circuit” and was rewarded with this document:

It’s nothing fancy, but it gets the job done. I quickly scrolled to the bathroom and identified the circuit that she was using. A quick scroll through the other rooms showed that she would be safe as long as she turned off the air conditioner in the bedroom.

Making a Circuit Map

There’s a little bit of process involved here, and it helps if you have someone else to help you.

Get a notepad and scrawl a rough sketch of each room in your house that has electrical outlets, switches, and lights. Don’t forget the basement, garage, and attic. Draw a rough sketch of each electrical outlet/switch on the maps. You can see in the image above that I simply drew a little box for each outlet and a box with bumps on it for a set of switches.

Then, shut off a single breaker and go around the house to see everything that lost power. Take a small desk lamp with you or, better yet, a proper line voltage test light, and test every single outlet until you identify the ones that are off.

Every time you find an outlet or switch that is off, write the breaker number on its spot on your map. You can see that breaker 19a and breaker 7 both control the living room in my house.

Now turn that breaker on and then turn off the next breaker and repeat the whole process.

It may take ten or fifteen minutes to make the first round-trip, but with each new breaker you have fewer things to test. You really only need to test outlets or switches that have not been identified yet.

When you are done, scan in everything and give the file a nice long descriptive name. Throw in some keywords if you are indexing your files in some application.

Using the Circuit Map

If you are concerned about the load on a given circuit, you can go through the whole document and look for every matching number (such as the “19a” from my living room) to see how many devices are on that circuit.

If you need to shut down power to a switch or outlet for any reason, find its breaker on your map, shut off the breaker, and then test the outlet with your line voltage tester before you do anything else. Even though you know the right breaker, you must always double-check that the circuit is dead before performing work.

By the way, my wife has had that Jiffy Steamer for years, and she absolutely loves it—it probably ranks right next to her iPad as all-time coolest and most useful products.

My situation is worse—both my wife and I are musicians, to one degree or another. Throw in the fact that she is a music teacher and you can imagine just how many pages of sheet music there are filling bins and flexing cheap shelving in my house.

What do I have and Where is it?

The biggest problem we face is knowing what we have and where it is. I have hundreds and hundreds of pages of classical and jazz guitar sheet music, but if I need to find Villalobos’ Choros no. 1, where do I look?

Shortly after I bought my ScanSnap, I began scanning in all of my sheet music (I have left much of my wife’s collection untouched—I’m sure you’ll understand). In most cases, I simply hacked the spine off of the original book and fed the sheets through the scanner. Now, I have less paper in the house and my music is searchable.

In most cases I didn’t bother to run OCR on the documents since there is little in the way of printed words on most sheet music that is worth indexing. I did take care to name the files well.

If you ever hope to find your music on your computer, make sure you include at least the composer/artist and song title in the file name.

Is this really cutting down on paper?

Whenever I find what I’m looking for I might play it directly off of the computer screen, but it is more likely that I’ll print it out. Doesn’t this kind of negate the idea of removing paper from my home? Not really. Think about it—most sheet music is never played. We have books with hundreds of songs in them and we play only  a handful. That’s just the way it is.

The fact that I print out five or ten pages in a month does not negate the many hundreds of pages that were scanned and then recycled.

Great for Music Lessons

I started taking jazz lessons again a month or two back, and my teacher gave me some lead sheets, with all kinds of useful annotations on them. As soon as I was home, I scanned those babies in, so I would not risk losing the valuable information. I also went through all of my notes from prior lessons and scanned them in as well. These kinds of things are precisely the sorts of paper that tend to get lost in some mismash of unsorted music.

Now, I can type in “Four” in my favorite PDF library application and find the lead sheet for Miles Davis’ Four.

Maybe you don’t have that many notebooks full of music lesson notes, but when you have been trying (poorly) to learn for as many years as I have, those notebooks begin to proliferate. Just scan them all in, give them some good filenames, add some keywords to help, and you’re in business.

What about copyright?

It seems that the jury is still out on digitizing works you own. There’s one fellow who made a right awesome device for scanning in textbooks in minutes, by photographing the pages. That guy’s machine has spurred much debate about whether or not you have the right to digitize your own stuff.

On the one hand, you bought the book and paid for it, so it would seem that fair use covers this; on the other hand, publishers are eager to monetize digital media, reselling the same works to you if they can.

So, is Daniel Reetz’s butt-kickin’ book scanner legal?

That would depend on who you talk to, says Pamela Samuelson, a professor at University of California at Berkeley, who specializes in digital-copyright law. Trade publishers are almost certain to cry copyright infringement, she says, though it may not necessarily be the case.

Google was recently forced to pay $125 million to settle with angry book publishers and authors who claimed copyright infringement as a result of the search giant’s book-scanning project.

But not so individual users who already own the book, says Samuelson. If you scan a book that you have already purchased, it is “fine, and fair use,” she says. “Personal-use copying should be deemed to be fair, unless there is a demonstrable showing of harm to the market for the copyright at work,” says Samuelson.

(Source: wired.com)

Here’s another take on this:

Question

I bought a book for school, can I make a copy of the book for my own use to write on so I don’t write in the book and can get my money back when I return the book to the campus store.

Accepted Answer

You have the right to make a copy of the book you purchased as long as you are using the copy for your personal use. The copyright laws merely prevent you from making copies to sell or distribute.

(Source: justanswer.com)

Of course, if you go passing your PDF documents around to all of your friends, all bets are off.

Final thoughts
Music is a hobby that seems to accumulate great stacks of paper, but these music sheets are peculiar in that you only need one or two out of every hundred. Why not digitize the whole lot and keep those book shelves from sagging?

The problem is this: with Outlook we will be limited to 1000 messages in our in-box; sadly, many of us have tens of thousands of emails in our old GroupWise mail. Even after a fairly rigorous slash and burn mission, hacking out all of the low hanging fruit, there will be many thousands remaining and I don’t want to lose that information. It might be useful to search and find how I set up a Zebra bar code printer in 2003, no?

A bundle of different freeware glue tools came to my rescue. Read on to hear about the toolset that has made it so I can keep those messages for years to come.

Possible Solutions

Right out of the gate, I began looking for ways to migrate messages from one mail client to the other. Some apps have this built right in, and if not, there are scripts and utilities out there to do this; but I was hampered by a few key facts:

• I have no control over the email clients and their configuration. Even if there is a menu option for exporting GroupWise messages from version 7.2, I’m stuck at 6.4 and cannot use that option.
• GroupWise is a minor player in the email world. I’m not sure if Outlook would import from GroupWise, but I doubt it.
• They are replacing the client in one shot. There will be no interim period where both GroupWise and Outlook will be available.
• There is no getting around the hard limit of 1000 messages.
• I don’t want to spend money on this.

With these constraints in mind, I immediately thought about PDF documents. I then considered the following questions:

• How do I convert my email to PDF?
• How can I do this automatically with thousands of emails?
• Once I’m done, how do I search these documents?

Here’s what I did:

Conversion to PDF

The first part was easy. I downloaded one of the many free print-to-PDF products available.

I chose PDFCreator, because I am familiar with its use and I know that it does not munge the fonts.

Like many other PDF generation utilities, PDFCreator functions by providing a virtual printer to which any application can print. For example, to make a PDF of a web page, you use the Firefox Print menu and select PDFCreator from the drop-down list of available printers.

You are provided with a list of metadata fields that you can fill in, and these fields are used in the PDF generation.

Here’s what the PDFCreator screen looks like:

A word of caution: PDF Creator is free, but you must be careful to deselect their spammy toolbar options in two different places during the installation process. I don’t like software that comes with preselected toolbars to install (even nice ones like Google’s) because I’m certain that 95% of the folks who actually install the toolbar would never have chosen to do so if it were unchecked by default.

Running Everything Automatically

This was the interesting bit. I work with Windows machines at work, so there was no AppleScript option available. So I did the next best thing: I used AutoIT.

I will warn you that AutoIT is pretty much the Windows analog of AppleScript, without the cutesy pseudo English syntax. In other words, you will need to roll up your sleeves and get your hands a little dirty in order to put together a decent AutoIT script.

The payoff comes when you finish your work and compile it into a tight executable that you can share with your friends, allowing them to automate some complex series of button clicks and copy/paste operations.

I walked through the manual process of exporting an email to PDF and listed each action:

• Get the date, sender, and subject
• Create a filename based on date + sender + subject
• Launch the Print dialog
• Select PDFCreator
• Fill in the Document Title, Creation Date, and Subject in the PDFCreator dialog
• Fill in the full file path in the Save dialog

In addition, I wanted to make the script a little better by adding the following:

• Check that user has PDFCreator installed
• Verify that GroupWise is running and that the user has selected one or more messages
• Prompt the user for a target directory before processing the messages
• Sanitize the filenames by replacing illegal characters with underscores and truncating to meet maximum filename and path length in Windows
• Skip over files that have already been generated, quickly, so that one doesn’t need to worry about accidentally selecting messages that were already printed

There were other adjustments needed, but the process was the same: run the script, hit a problem, tweak the script a little to address the problem, and repeat.

Here’s a little bit of the AutoIT script:

You can see that it is a bit more intense than AppleScript, but remember that the full script wasn’t written in one go. I had a little short ten-line script that I kept tweaking as small problems cropped up until I had adjusted things to my liking.

Note that this is a GUI macro language. The machine starts clicking and typing away right in front of you and you probably shouldn’t interfere until your script finishes.

As of this afternoon, I have generated around 4,000 PDF documents for my email messages.

Searching All of Those Documents

This was the easiest part. These days there is an excellent tool available for searching documents on your desktop: Google Desktop. This product indexes every useful file on your desktop and provides a full Google search with a quick double-tap of the <control> key.

So you can enter a search like “Zebra bar code”

And the results look exactly like a Google web search, but it’s showing your desktop files. And you can see inline previews too.

Macintosh users can install Google Desktop as well, but all of these files should already be indexed and searchable by Spotlight.

Closing Thoughts

Whenever I reach for tools like this I feel a twinge of guilt—it’s outright hackery, isn’t it?

But there is a place for quick and dirty jobs in every workplace. I needed to get my files from one place to another, one time only. It just didn’t make sense to spend money or time on a more elegant solution.

Play around with each of these tools a little. Especially AutoIT—it’s a handy Swiss Army Knife to have at your disposal.

I am of the opinion that rather than allowing an application to shuffle your life randomly, why not do it the old fashioned way and move your documents into folders of your choosing?

This article discusses some of the advantages of old-school folder management and gives a few hints along the way.

Why bother?

By creating your own well thought out folder structure, you gain the following advantages:

• You can find something fairly easily without needing to launch the special app.
• You can copy reasonable subsets of your document sets to friends or for backups.
• Someone else can find something without needing the special app.
• You can place files in a common network drive that others can see, from PC, Linux, or Mac.
• You do not lose all of the metadata about your files if the document management app ceases to exist.

People have been managing their documents this way for decades, so this is not anything new. What is new, however, is that folks don’t necessarily see what flexibility they give up when they allow the computer to squirrel things away on their behalf.

What kind of folders?

In short, pick some categories of documents that you will be filing, and optionally pick a timeframe which to partition the folders. This mirrors what we do with paper folders, doesn’t it? We create dozens of manila folders with tabs, and optionally create subsets of these files by date (e.g. Receipts, 2009).

One key difference helps us: Computer folders enjoy one feature that their physical counterparts lack—they can be nested several layers deep.

A few examples are probably in order…

I like to keep several kinds of scanned documents relating to day to day home paperwork. Over time, it has become clear that I scan lots of receipts, health insurance papers, banking papers, bills, and … everything else.

As such, I created the following top-level folders: Banking, Bills, Health Insurance, Receipts, and Miscellaneous.

Over time, they start to get stuffed to the gills with things, especially the Bills and the Receipts folders. My answer to this was to split them out by date. Within each category folder I have subfolders by date. This is because some categories need lots of years, while others might not need to be broken down by date at all.

Digital photos are a different creature: I feel that the date of the photo is the most important piece of information, and subject matter is secondary. For this reason, I store my photos in a series of top-level folders labeled with the years.

With photos I have a three-level system: Year, Month, and Subject. For example, within the Photos folder there is a 2009 folder. That contains a 2009-02 folder, and that one contains a folder called Cats. There are many ways to arrange these, I have chosen this approach.

I like iPhoto as much as anyone, and I use it for my photos. The difference is that, for me, iPhoto only holds a copy of each photo—the original photos are all stored on a NAS using the file structure I describe above.

Put a little thought into it and come up with a system that works for you.

Closing thoughts

We are looking for ease of use here, as well as avoiding lock-in to some proprietary app. We also want it to be easy to back up specific bits of the data and share specific bits.

By looking at my example above, you can see how easy it would be to find a bill from 2009. By following a specific naming convention, you can see that each document is fairly descriptive as well. You don’t need DEVONthink or its brethren to tell you how to find the Allstate bill from June of 2009. In addition, the folder names are now easily searchable by my operating system, as are the filenames.

This might create extra work for you in the beginning, but do you really want to be at the mercy of someone else’s application?

Oh, and about making those folders? There are applications out there that can generate a bunch of folders for you following your own chosen rules. One I use is The Big Mean Folder Machine.  I wouldn’t want to depend on an automatic system for daily use, but as a one-time jump start, tools like this can work wonders.

Don’t forget to back up your files!

Apparently this is not the case

It seems that the TSA has leaked their official document of airport security guidelines. ABC News says Online Posting Reveals a “How To” for Terrorists to Get Through Airport Security

A Rookie Mistake

Look at the screenshot of the document at the top of this post. Even though a certain part of the document has been blacked out, it is possible to select the text and copy/paste to find out what is hidden behind the black text.

What kinds of things are listed in this document?

• Photographs of all kinds of official ID cards. Ever wondered what a U.S. Senator’s ID card looks like?
• Procedures for calibrating equipment, such as where guns should be hidden for the testing and such.
• Guidelines for who gets searched and who doesn’t.
• Guidelines for what objects get searched and which don’t.
• And much much more!

In other words, this was a most unfortunate event.

See for yourself—ABC News (and others) have posted the document with redactions removed.

Easy as Pie

Here’s a screenshot of the original document, opened in Adobe Acrobat Professional.

As you can see, it was a trivial matter to use the TouchUp Object tool to gently slide the black rectangle off of the secret stuff (I have blurred the text here, though you can read it from ABC News if you wish).

If you are working with confidential documents that could potentially cause disaster if leaked, please learn how to redact your documents correctly!

As it would turn out, there were several thousand other documents on a file server that shared the same funny behavior. By the time we were done struggling with this problem I had gained new respect for PDF corruption issues and their prevention.

The Problem

We were looking to load a few thousand of these scientific reports into a fancy-schmancy new database, with linguistics searching and other bells and whistles. Much to our chagrin, these documents just weren’t loading, and we couldn’t understand why. They were text documents, with some embedded images, but mostly straightforward text.

Here is an excerpt:

And you can tell that it is right and proper text because when I blow it up all the way, the fonts are nice and smooth—this isn’t just an image of text.

But if I copy and paste that particular paragraph into any handy editor (Notepad, in this case), this is what I see:

And as far as I know, at this point the actual text is beyond the reach of average folks like me. We tried, believe me we tried.

What went wrong?

A quick Google of the subject led us to understand that many PDF generation tools embed subsets of fonts, with nonstandard mappings from the text to the font.

This fellow explains it nicely:

“The PDF file does not contain all the information to extract the text. The problem is that a character in a PDF file may not contain information what “real” character it relates to. Some PDF generators do a pretty bad job when they embed fonts into PDF files. They use a proprietary encoding mechanism (e.g. 1 is A, 2 is B, 3 is C, …) in both the embedded font and when they place glyphs on the page. Without a table that implements the reverse (e.g. character code 1 is ‘A’) you cannot extract text from such a file.

There is nothing you can do (besides to complain to whoever created the PDF file, and the author of the software that created this file).”
— from khkremer on experts-exchange.com

As it would turn out, many of the reports had been generated by printing to Adobe Distiller from Microsoft Word. It would seem that the default settings used for Distiller included the “totally hose my document content” switch.

The Solution

We fretted over this quite a bit. These are important scientific reports, and there is no way to easily ungarble them. We finally ended up contacting the Abbyy Finereader folks and trying out their OCR toolkit for Linux: not only did this product make fast work of running optical character recognition on the sample document, but once we had a script running, we managed to blow through the 10,000 pages the trial license gave us, in a day or two.

Imperfect, at best

I am happy that we were able to salvage the bulk of the electronic knowledge found within those thousands of files, but our work barely scratched the surface.

For example, most of these documents have rich bookmarking of sections and keywording, such as this (content tastefully blurred on purpose).

In addition, scientific documents typically have loads of tables full of numbers. Though it is possible to mine this data with a good OCR tool (the FineReader API provides tools for just this purpose), the tables are far more difficult to extract correctly once the original text information is lost.

Final thoughts

I wrote a few weeks about document formats, mentioning the PDF/A document standard. This is worth investigating, regardless of what your document needs are.

If our thousands of files had been originally generated as PDF/A, it is certain that we would have been able to copy/paste from them without problem: PDF/A prohibits such font shenanigans as were perpetrated on our garbled reports.

In the end, our OCR sledgehammer approach worked like a charm, and is probably sufficient for our needs. Text mining is a pretty slushy business, so no-one will complain if there are a few typos on each page—if they find the doc in a search, they can print it and read it the old fashioned way.

Over the past couple of years I have considered several different approaches for keeping a grip on which computers had which service patch, which router is getting flaky, and which cable connects the library to the classroom at the end of the hall.

I have tried Excel spreadsheets, an Access database, even a spiral-bound notebook—none of them made the job any easier. A few weeks ago I thought about trying a Wiki and this has turned out to be a perfect fit!

If you are looking to keep a loose scrapbook of notes with lots of arbitrary categories and relationships between them, a wiki might do the trick. In this article I’ll cover two simple freeware wikis you can carry around on a thumb drive.

What’s in a Wiki?

All of us have used Wikipedia at one time or another, and though it may be regarded with disdain by high school teachers, when you consider how it works, Wikipedia is an amazing achievement. But what is the nature of a wiki?

One of the key features is that any page can be easily edited at any time (of course this can be limited by permissions). Another attribute is the ability to breathe life into a new page just by calling its name.

Between these two features, you get the essence of wiki-ness.

For example, if I have a page that discusses North American bears, I can type in a list of bears in a special format, often in jammed-together Wiki Words, like this:

• GrizzleyBear
• BlackBear
• BrownBear

As soon as I save the page, those bear names become hyperlinks. Even though I haven’t written any pages about the individual bears, whenever it finally suits me, I can click on BlackBear and accept the invitation to “Create a new page called BlackBear”

Better still, a friend who knows about black bears might click on BlackBear and write a beautiful page about the animals.

That’s what wikis are all about.

Back to the School Computers

In a matter of minutes I was able to make a page that described the building and listed the various rooms in the building. I was able to then click on each room and “auto-vivify” a page for the room.

From that point, it was easy to create custom pages for each computer in the building, with each page listing the machine’s stats. I also created pages for each network switch or router.

In a matter of two or three evenings I had the skeleton of a solid knowledge base populated—it’s a pretty fancy looking web site with dozens of pages that took little effort to put together.

Last night I noticed that one of the machines wasn’t connecting to the Internet, though it connects fine to internal servers. I popped open its page on the wiki and added a simple note at the bottom of the page:

2009-10-11 - This machine isn't able to connect to the Internet. Not sure why. It connects fine to internal servers.

A few weeks ago I replaced a fan in a network switch. An easy annotation on the wiki page for that device.

Personal Wikis

There are many uses for personal wikis, mostly centered around personal knowledge management and personal information management. People use wikis as a replacement for time and task management tools, as a place for gathering thoughts, as a sort of amorphous database, and many other things.

There are many different personal wikis available—here’s a short list of free ones. One nice simple wiki to try is TiddlyWiki. If you are looking for something with a bit more substance, you can try a portable version of MediaWiki—the engine behind Wikipedia—that runs off your thumb drive.

TiddlyWiki

This afternoon I downloaded the flyweight portable wiki called TiddlyWiki. This is an amazingly tight little application—it comes in the form of a single fat web page that you copy to your thumb drive. As you make edits to your TiddlyWiki, the single html page is saved with your changes. Since it’s a single fancy file, backups are dead easy.

Here’s what it looks like when you first launch the “empty.html” file:

After a half hour of twiddling around, I had thrown together this basic set of “Tiddlers”

In this screen shot you can see that there are now links that bring up custom “Tiddlers” for each computer and for each room. I have opened one of the little pages for Computer21.

They describe these pages as being comparable to note cards. All in all, it is tight and easy to use.

Want to give it a try? Download it from the TiddlyWiki site. You really need to play with it to get a feel for what it can do!

MediaWiki

If you are looking for something with a little more meat on it, you can run the Wikipedia engine on your USB drive.

The easiest way to set this up is to let MoWeS do everything for you. MoWeS stands for Modular Webserver System. It’s a free product that you can configure as a self-contained Apache web server with a variety of cool apps like MediaWiki, running off a thumb drive.

Here’s how to set up MediaWiki in five minutes:

• Go to the MoWeS Mixer
• The first time around choose “I do not have a MoWeS Portable II Package and want to obtain a new package” when prompted and click Go.
• On the software lists, check Apache2, MySQL5, PHP5, and MediaWiki
• Click Download Now
• At this point they ask you some kind of question in German, to filter spambots, but it seems to be a simple math problem. Fill in the answer and click Submit Query
  (“Zum Schutz vor Downloadrobotern geben Sie bitte das Ergebnis dieser Aufgabe ein: 5 + 8 = ?“)
• Unzip the downloaded zip file, mowes_portable.zip, and copy the files to your USB drive
• Open your thumb drive and double-click mowes.exe
• Select your language and accept the license
• Click install, and confirm when prompted

The installation process may take several minutes, but rest assured that it isn’t installing anything on your computer.

Note: I received two or three firewall warnings for the Apache web server and the MySQL database. I had to click the “Unblock” button for all of them before my new MediaWiki-on-a-stick would work correctly.

After all of the dust settled, I have this little window on my screen:

In order to shut down and close out, just click the End button.

Once your MediaWiki USB key is running, you can go to this web page:

http://127.0.0.1/mediawiki/index.php/Main_Page

It looks just like Wikipedia, doesn’t it?

What a truly amazing thing: you can carry around your own Wikipedia server on a USB key and plug it in any random machine and start it up.

Different Wiki Features

As you try out different wiki software, you will notice that there are plenty of differences in the features they support:

• Each wiki has a different kind of editor. Some are visual; others are simple text editors.
• The markup syntax you use for pages is different from wiki to wiki.
• Most wikis support features such as “category pages” that find all pages tagged with a category.
• Some support adding images and other content; others don’t. I imagine that TiddlyWiki probably has some means of embedding images, but I couldn’t find it.
• A quick glance at the MediaWiki screenshot above shows extended features such as the Discussion tab and the History tab.
• Some use the filesystem for their pages; others use a database.

Since I wanted a central wiki for the whole school, I chose a different product from the portable wikis I discussed here—I decided to run MoinMoin on a Ubuntu installation on an aging Gateway desktop machine. Nevertheless, the basic idea is still the same.

Once that arrangement becomes a little more stable I’ll write up a howto document, like the Linux NAS one from a few months back.

Other Sources

There are loads of different personal wiki options out there and many people have written how-to documents and tutorials. Here’s a few:

• Run Your Personal Wikipedia from a USB Stick (Lifehacker.com)
• Geek to Live: Set up your personal Wikipedia (Lifehacker.com)
• Wiki On A Stick (PmWiki.org)
• Getting Started with Wiki on a Stick (About.com)
• TiddlyWiki for the rest of us (giffmex)

Thanks to its face-recognition tool, iPhoto ’09 can now put names to the faces in your photographs, letting you quickly sift through your library based on content rather than how photos are arranged. But putting this feature to work requires some effort on your part.

A few months back I received my copy of iLife ’09 and was quite pleased with the new Faces feature—I recall losing a couple of evenings sifting through photos and finding people I had forgotten.

Derrick Story from Macworld has written an article providing some tips for getting the most out of Faces. Even if you have been using the product since it was released, you may find these tips useful.

For example, after reading the article I immediately set up a smart folder that shows all unassigned faces—called “Missing Persons.” A simple idea that I would have never thought of.

I still don’t tire of refining the Faces gallery in my iPhoto collection!

Read the full article here: 7 tips for using Faces in iPhoto ’09 (Macworld.com)

23 tips for getting organized, streamlining your online time, managing your media and more

In this Computerworld article, the writer gives several great tips on getting your geeky side in order. I’m happy to note that procurement of a Fujitsu ScanSnap and scanning your life to PDF made number 4 on his list.

Other useful tips include topics such as cable management solutions (for that rat’s nest of wires), Google Desktop search and Google Sync, online identity management, and protecting your children online.

Check it out: How to simplify your tech life (Computerworld)

“How a lifestyle experiment and a disaster made me realize the value of turning atoms into bits” — Mike Elgin

A couple of months back, Mike Elgin of Computerworld posted an article on his foray into the paperless world: Paperless office? Ha! How about a paperless life?

In this followup article, he considers how lifestyle changes and the raging wildfires closing in on his city have made it clear to him that it is critical to protect whatever can be easily preserved in digital form.

Mike gives a sound strategy, starting off with a fast pass at just getting it digitized with little regard for perfection, followed by more focused efforts.

He pointed out how some objects just aren’t as important as the memories that they represent, illustrating this with a photograph of his son’s martial arts trophies that he has since donated to various organizations.

Mike makes it very clear that backups are mandatory. My kind of guy!

Here’s the whole article: Why you should digitize ‘everything’ (Computerworld.com)