<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Life&#8217;s too short to fight with a lame shredder</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paperjammed.com/2009/06/16/lifes-too-short-to-fight-with-a-lame-shredder/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paperjammed.com/2009/06/16/lifes-too-short-to-fight-with-a-lame-shredder/</link>
	<description>Has paper taken over your life?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 18:27:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tad</title>
		<link>http://paperjammed.com/2009/06/16/lifes-too-short-to-fight-with-a-lame-shredder/comment-page-1/#comment-2668</link>
		<dc:creator>Tad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paperjammed.com/?p=577#comment-2668</guid>
		<description>Good point. My only real long-term experience with a strip-cut shredder was when I was on temporary duty in the Navy, facing a hallway filled with boxes, and one great big industrial-strength shredder. The beast simply spewed its product out the back end into a waiting barrel. We filled full-size trash bags at a stupendous rate, shredding non stop all day long.

Sadly, the actual content of the records we were shredding was rather dull and uninteresting. No missile plans; just recruit medical reports and such.

I like the pre-staged piles idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point. My only real long-term experience with a strip-cut shredder was when I was on temporary duty in the Navy, facing a hallway filled with boxes, and one great big industrial-strength shredder. The beast simply spewed its product out the back end into a waiting barrel. We filled full-size trash bags at a stupendous rate, shredding non stop all day long.</p>
<p>Sadly, the actual content of the records we were shredding was rather dull and uninteresting. No missile plans; just recruit medical reports and such.</p>
<p>I like the pre-staged piles idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joolz</title>
		<link>http://paperjammed.com/2009/06/16/lifes-too-short-to-fight-with-a-lame-shredder/comment-page-1/#comment-2500</link>
		<dc:creator>Joolz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paperjammed.com/?p=577#comment-2500</guid>
		<description>I originally had a strip-cut shredder but swapped it for a cross cut, not for security reasons but more for capacity, as I found that the strip shredded waste took up a lot more room than cross cut - which equals more emptying of the bin! 
A good tip I found was if you are shredding a lot of pages to stack them into smaller piles first; say 5-6 pages vertically, then 5-6 pages horizontally, then 5-6 vertically again. I found that I spent more time trying to grab the right number of pages that I knew wouldn&#039;t jam the shredder than shredding, so batching that task up beforehand meant I could focus purely on the shredding part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I originally had a strip-cut shredder but swapped it for a cross cut, not for security reasons but more for capacity, as I found that the strip shredded waste took up a lot more room than cross cut &#8211; which equals more emptying of the bin!<br />
A good tip I found was if you are shredding a lot of pages to stack them into smaller piles first; say 5-6 pages vertically, then 5-6 pages horizontally, then 5-6 vertically again. I found that I spent more time trying to grab the right number of pages that I knew wouldn&#8217;t jam the shredder than shredding, so batching that task up beforehand meant I could focus purely on the shredding part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
